With the new design of the Rainham History website it is now much easier to be able to publish documents quickly. As such it is intended to try to publish the Action Forum magazine online within a few days of it being distributed.
The latest issues from May and April 2011 are now online and can be viewed here. The full magazine is a large download (21Mb) but contains the full content of the magazine.
http://www.rainham-history.co.uk/action-forum
Comments and questions about history and people of Rainham Kent. Please post comments if you have any information on any of these subjects.
Tuesday, 17 May 2011
Monday, 2 May 2011
Mobile Phone Masts to Improve Service in Wigmore, Rainham and Hempstead
Two new mobile phone masts are proposed for Wigmore and Hempstead to improve coverage for O2 and Vodafone. Both proposed sites are situated so that they are not directly outside a residential property and the Wigmore site in particular is on an empty piece of land that is adjacent to two mini roundabouts. Current designs for mobile phone masts are very similar to lampposts so they will be virtually invisible with all the other street furniture in a road. Some local residents are campaigning against the site of these mobile phone masts although they acknowledge there is a problem with mobile phone reception.
One resident gave the classic line "I realise reception is poor in Hempstead, but there must be a better way of improving reception." Unfortunately not - the only way to improve reception is to add more masts especially to improve 3G coverage which requires masts to be more closely spaced than for the older G2/GPRS technology.
Another argument is that the masts are situated too close to local schools - one suggestion was that 300m was too close to a school. Presumably that means campaigners believe that a radius of say at least 500m around any school cannot have any masts. In some areas with several schools this would mean that no masts could be erected at all giving no mobile coverage. In other areas with one school it would mean they had to be at least 1km apart and would leave huge empty spots of coverage where little signal exists.
If no-one used mobile phones due to the perceived health risks then the mobile companies would not be rolling out new masts. However mobile use is increasing so clearly mobile phone users - including the campaigners against the masts - are happy to use their phones.
The most common complaint from mobile phone users is lack of signal - if these campaigns get their way then this situation will not be improved.
More info on the guidelines that Mobile Operators use for siting mobile phone masts here
Health effects of mobile phone masts http://www.vodafone.com/content/index/uk_corporate_responsibility/protecting/mobiles_health.html
One resident gave the classic line "I realise reception is poor in Hempstead, but there must be a better way of improving reception." Unfortunately not - the only way to improve reception is to add more masts especially to improve 3G coverage which requires masts to be more closely spaced than for the older G2/GPRS technology.
Another argument is that the masts are situated too close to local schools - one suggestion was that 300m was too close to a school. Presumably that means campaigners believe that a radius of say at least 500m around any school cannot have any masts. In some areas with several schools this would mean that no masts could be erected at all giving no mobile coverage. In other areas with one school it would mean they had to be at least 1km apart and would leave huge empty spots of coverage where little signal exists.
If no-one used mobile phones due to the perceived health risks then the mobile companies would not be rolling out new masts. However mobile use is increasing so clearly mobile phone users - including the campaigners against the masts - are happy to use their phones.
The most common complaint from mobile phone users is lack of signal - if these campaigns get their way then this situation will not be improved.
More info on the guidelines that Mobile Operators use for siting mobile phone masts here
Health effects of mobile phone masts http://www.vodafone.com/content/index/uk_corporate_responsibility/protecting/mobiles_health.html
Thursday, 28 April 2011
Mobile Phone Mast Campaign - Wigmore and Hempstead
When running the Rainham History site I have always tried to keep a neutral stance on local issues to avoid any controversy. However the local paper today is reporting a campaign to stop a new mobile phone mast being erected in Durham Road is one that I feel needs to be highlighted. My personal view is that this is a crazy decision to try to stop the mast being installed. The huge majority of people use mobile phones and want to be able to have good coverage. It is all very well having campaigners stating that masts should be erected in commercial areas only; however most people who want to be able to use their mobile phone do not live in a commercial area and want to be able to make phone calls at home.
Mobile phone masts are needed where people want to use their mobile phones. If the campaigners are prepared to accept that they will not use a mobile phone themselves then they may have a case but anyone using a mobile themselves has no justification to then stop a mast being erected or they risk being accused of hypocrisy. The coverage around Wigmore area is particularly poor and this mast will resolve the problem by filling in the poor coverage spots.
Sadly our local councillors are campaigning against the mast so I would urge any interested parties to raise this during the election campaign, they can be contacted by email mike.obrien@medway.gov.uk, barry.kemp@medway.gov.uk, rehman.chishti@medway.gov.uk
More information on the location of the mast can be found here
You can email your support for the mast to Mike O Brien, Councillor for Rainham using this email mike.obrien@medway.gov.uk . Hopefully with enough emails he will realise the majority are in favour of the mast going ahead.
NOTE: If you are concerned about mobile phone masts then check on the locations that are already in place including opposite Parkwood school in the centre of the Parkwood residential area. An additional mast will have no impact on any radiation levels based on the number that already are constructed. You can check the locations of mobile masts in Rainham at this website http://www.sitefinder.ofcom.org.uk/search
You will see that there are currently 3 masts in the centre of Rainham (Brown St/Quinnell St) and one at Rainham station, as well as 18 (yes 18) other masts in Wigmore/Hempstead including Woodside and Fairview Avenue. All are in the middle of residential areas.
Mobile phone masts are needed where people want to use their mobile phones. If the campaigners are prepared to accept that they will not use a mobile phone themselves then they may have a case but anyone using a mobile themselves has no justification to then stop a mast being erected or they risk being accused of hypocrisy. The coverage around Wigmore area is particularly poor and this mast will resolve the problem by filling in the poor coverage spots.
Sadly our local councillors are campaigning against the mast so I would urge any interested parties to raise this during the election campaign, they can be contacted by email mike.obrien@medway.gov.uk, barry.kemp@medway.gov.uk, rehman.chishti@medway.gov.uk
More information on the location of the mast can be found here
You can email your support for the mast to Mike O Brien, Councillor for Rainham using this email mike.obrien@medway.gov.uk . Hopefully with enough emails he will realise the majority are in favour of the mast going ahead.
NOTE: If you are concerned about mobile phone masts then check on the locations that are already in place including opposite Parkwood school in the centre of the Parkwood residential area. An additional mast will have no impact on any radiation levels based on the number that already are constructed. You can check the locations of mobile masts in Rainham at this website http://www.sitefinder.ofcom.org.uk/search
You will see that there are currently 3 masts in the centre of Rainham (Brown St/Quinnell St) and one at Rainham station, as well as 18 (yes 18) other masts in Wigmore/Hempstead including Woodside and Fairview Avenue. All are in the middle of residential areas.
Thursday, 21 April 2011
Rainham Train Station Bomb Scare
Rainham train station was closed on 21 April 2011 due to suspect package being found on the platform at 6am. Trains from the coastal towns like Dover and Margate were unable to use the main line to London as a result of the station being closed. Buses replaced trains between Faversham and Gillingham during the incident which affected both the standard and high speed trains to London delaying many commuters during the morning rush hour.
http://www.rainham-history.co.uk/news/68-rainham-train-station-bomb-scare
http://www.rainham-history.co.uk/news/68-rainham-train-station-bomb-scare
The bomb squad were called to Rainham railway station during the morning rush hour when a suspicious package was found. A bomb warning was issued and Rainham station was evacuated. A controlled explosion took place and the police reported that it was "not an explosive device"
http://www.kentonline.co.uk/kentonline/news/2011-1/april/21/suspect_package_causes_rush_ho.aspx
Thursday, 14 April 2011
Three Sisters public house in Otterham Quay Lane, Rainham
This request for help has been received, if you have any information please let Roger know. If you can also post here too it may be useful to add to the site.
I am seeking a bit of help to see if anybody knows the origin of the name for the Three sisters public house in Otterham Quay Lane, Rainham, maybe who the Three sisters are that it refers too. If not could you point me in the right direction of somebody who may know.
I appreciate any help that you may be able to give.
Roger Pester
Inn Sign Society
rogerpester45@talktalk.net
I am seeking a bit of help to see if anybody knows the origin of the name for the Three sisters public house in Otterham Quay Lane, Rainham, maybe who the Three sisters are that it refers too. If not could you point me in the right direction of somebody who may know.
I appreciate any help that you may be able to give.
Roger Pester
Inn Sign Society
rogerpester45@talktalk.net
Thursday, 7 April 2011
New Rainham History site coming soon
Sneak preview of the new Rainham History site. Moving to a brand new platform that will make maintenance and updates much easier and faster.
http://www.rainham-kent.co.uk
http://www.rainham-kent.co.uk
Monday, 21 March 2011
Manor Farm has photos of wrong Rainham!
I was in the Manor Farm pub recently and on their walls are old photos of Rainham. It is a nice touch to see pictures of how the area used to be so when we spotted one photo we were trying to work out where it was taken.
The name wasn't familiar, Bridge Road nor the scene of flooding with a church in the background. A quick search of the web showed that it was actually not a local scene and was actually taken in Rainham, Essex!
You can see more photos of Rainham Essex here
http://www.rainhamweb.co.uk/history/past2.html
Or for old photos of Rainham Kent click here
The name wasn't familiar, Bridge Road nor the scene of flooding with a church in the background. A quick search of the web showed that it was actually not a local scene and was actually taken in Rainham, Essex!
You can see more photos of Rainham Essex here
http://www.rainhamweb.co.uk/history/past2.html
Or for old photos of Rainham Kent click here
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)